Ethereum fixes Glamsterdam bug that could have sent staking deposits to builders

- Ethereum developers patched a flaw in the upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade that could have allowed an operator to withdraw ETH intended for new validators.
- The vulnerability involved builder and validator deposits sharing a public key, potentially crediting both deposits to the builder and leaving staking services unable to recover their funds.
- No losses have been reported, and client teams must now incorporate the revised deposit rules before Glamsterdam can proceed toward a mainnet launch.
Ethereum developers have patched a flaw in the upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade that could have let someone walk off with ETH that staking services meant for new validators.
The fix, which changed the rules for handling validator deposits, was merged Monday, a week after developers turned it down.
Glamsterdam splits up two jobs that are bundled together today. Builders bundle transactions into blocks, and validators, who stake ETH to help secure the network, pick and confirm them. Both can deposit ETH, and their money is supposed to be tracked separately.
How the money could go missing
The problem appeared during the upgrade itself, when Ethereum would process deposits that were still waiting to be credited.
Researcher Avsetsin identified a scenario in which an operator first registers as a builder using a particular public key, the identifier tied to a validator or builder. If a staking service then deposits ETH to start a validator under that key, the draft rules would credit both deposits to the builder.
“The operator can withdraw the protocol’s funds,” Avsetsin wrote. No validator gets created, so the staking service can’t produce the proof it would need to recover its money.
Avsetsin, listed as a member of Lido’s GitHub organization, examined how Lido, Origin, and Rocket Pool could be affected in what the researcher called “quick AI research.” The findings depended on how each protocol handles deposits.
“These are conditional code findings, not confirmed live exploits,” avsetsin wrote, adding that existing checks rejecting an earlier builder deposit could stop the attack. No losses have been reported.
Turned down, then merged
Developers closed the proposed fix on Oct. 19. “There was not enough support from clients to make this change at this time,” wrote Justin Traglia, who maintains Ethereum’s consensus specifications. Clients are the separate software programs validators run to take part in the network.
The fix was reopened after further review, avsetsin added tests on Oct. 23, and Traglia merged it Monday.
Under the new rules, pending deposits are sorted by their withdrawal credentials, the setting that says where a deposit’s money can eventually go. Validator deposits stay with validators even if a builder is using the same key.
The change is now part of Ethereum’s consensus specifications, and client teams still have to build it into their software. Glamsterdam has already run on the Sepolia test network, but its Oct. 26 launch on Hoodi, a second test network, was postponed.

- 1Now is the time to accumulate bitcoin, Galaxy says3 minutes ago
- 2An AI label alone no longer wins lenders, JPMorgan says1 hour ago
- 3Solana bug reports now cost 1 SOL as AI floods security teams with spam2 hours ago
- 4Zcash co-founder proposes ending grants funding, citing $125 million treasury3 hours ago
- 5Ripple gets a final go-ahead to launch its own U.S. national trust bank5 hours ago
- 6Tom Lee's Bitmine favors share buybacks to ether purchases as crypto declines17 hours ago
- 7NBA joins pro sports leagues on CFTC prediction markets bandwagon while NFL balks17 hours ago
- 8OCC calls on community banks to enter the stablecoin payments market18 hours ago
- 9South Korea weighs fourth delay on its crypto gains tax, pushing it to 202918 hours ago
- 10Canada opens consultation on draft stablecoin rules, maintains ban on yields19 hours ago
Beyond the Risk-Free Rate: Diversified Real World Yield in Productive Stablecoins

Beyond the Risk-Free Rate: Diversified Real World Yield in Productive Stablecoins
Diversified RWA stablecoins sustain 5-7% yield from real credit as crypto funding compresses to ~4%. GENIUS pushes yield off-chain; TAM grows to $4B in 3 years.
Diversified RWA stablecoins sustain 5-7% yield from real credit as crypto funding compresses to ~4%. GENIUS pushes yield off-chain; TAM grows to $4B in 3 years.
Why it matters:
Diversified RWA stablecoins sustain 5-7% yield from real credit as crypto funding compresses to ~4%. GENIUS pushes yield off-chain; TAM grows to $4B in 3 years.

Solana bug reports now cost 1 SOL as AI floods security teams with spam
Live news: Bitcoin dips below $80,000 as stocks rally following Anthropic IPO filing
